Joe Biden ramps up attack on China with EV tariffs


For Biden, the decision to impose punitive tariffs on EVs, solar cells, batteries and, perhaps, semiconductors is both a pre-emptive move to protect his car industry, but also to protect the hundreds of billions of dollars his administration has provided, through his signature Inflation Reduction Act, to rebuild a green manufacturing base.

There’s a strand of national security concern – EVs are capable of collecting and on-sending vast amounts of data, some of it potentially sensitive – and also significant domestic political sensitivities, given that Biden has been trying to attract the votes of manufacturing workers and the autoworkers in particular.

The US is ramping up tariffs on a number of China’s green industries, including economic vehicles.Credit: Bloomberg

Not to be outdone, Donald Trump’s response to the Biden plan has been to say that he would slap 200 per cent tariffs on Chinese EVs, along with his plan to lift the tariff rate on all Chinese imports to 60 per cent. Trump imposed an average rate of just over 20 per cent on all imports from China during his previous administration.

China dominates the manufacturing for most of the green technologies, producing about 80 per cent of the world’s solar panels, a similar global share in batteries and 60 per cent in EVs as part of the national strategy, supported by layers of subsidies and non-financial support, developed over more than two decades.

Those industries are geared for exports, leveraging off China’s vast domestic market, and would be left with significant overcapacity if their major offshore markets were closed off.


While the US move is pre-emptive rather than a response to an immediate threat, the prospect of being shut out of Europe would be of far greater concern to China.

The European Union, which launched an anti-subsidy investigation into its imports of Chinese EVs last October, said earlier this year it had found evidence that China had been unfairly subsidising its EV manufacturers through government revenue foregone or not collected, government supplies of goods and services at “less than adequate remuneration”, as well as direct transfers of funds and cheap loans.

The EU has started requiring customs registration of Chinese EV imports in case it decides to apply retrospective tariffs, with EU officials hinting earlier this month that tariffs could be imposed mid-year.

The EU, which has the most advanced and stringent regime for reducing carbon emissions, isn’t (unlike the US) seeking to ban all Chinese EV imports.

It wants a more level playing field for its auto industries so that they aren’t wiped out, but it needs still relatively cheap Chinese EVs to achieve its emissions targets because its domestic companies aren’t capable of producing the volumes of affordable vehicles required.

While China says it competes fairly and criticises the responses from Western governments as protectionist (which they are), its state-driven economic model is inherently built on identifying and subsidising, via all mechanisms possible, industries where it believes it can gain competitive advantage and dominate globally.

The weaknesses in its economy exposed by the collapse of its property sector and the pandemic have seen it look to exports to maintain growth, promoting more investment in factories geared for exports of products deemed strategic.

In a reflection of the excess capacity that has created, domestic prices have been falling – China has been experiencing deflation – and, while the volume of its exports has been rising, their value hasn’t risen in tandem.

It is, as the Americans and Europeans have been arguing, flooding the world with cheap goods that threaten their own industries and employment.

Tariffs and subsidies are a crude response. They lock in higher prices for consumers, generating inflation in the process. To the extent that they displace Chinese exports, those goods will be diverted to other, more receptive markets, leaving those economies sheltering behind trade barriers with shrinking markets for their own, less internationally competitive goods.

China dominates the manufacturing for most of the green technologies.

China dominates the manufacturing for most of the green technologies.Credit: Bloomberg

The alternative, of course, is to allow China’s exports to flood in, lowering costs across the economy – particularly the cost of green transitions – but cementing the global dominance of strategic industries by, from the US and European perspective, a geopolitical rival.

That’s not to say China could easily switch its output of EVs or solar panels to new markets. Europe accounts for about 40 per cent (and rising) of its EV exports and just under 50 per cent of its solar panel exports. Given the degree of excess capacity in its manufacturing base, if those were choked off to any material degree, it would suffer significant economic indigestion.

The Biden administration is trying to be strategic. Rather than the general tariff wall that Trump wants to build around the US economy, it is seeking to target specific industries where China’s exports threaten US investment and jobs in industries it also sees as vital to its evolving economy, that have national security implications or that could create economic vulnerabilities if dominated by a rival. It’s doing so while trying to maintain a broader trade relationship with China.


It is conceivable, if this weren’t an election year and if Biden weren’t up against the “Tariff Man,” the four-year review of Trump’s tariffs that are the backdrop to this week’s announcement might have included some lowering of the duty rates on non-strategic imports from China. In the current political context, that’s unlikely.

The Business Briefing newsletter delivers major stories, exclusive coverage and expert opinion. Sign up to get it every weekday morning.

Read original article here

Denial of responsibility! Genx Newz is an automatic aggregator of the all world’s media. In each content, the hyperlink to the primary source is specified. All trademarks belong to their rightful owners, all materials to their authors. If you are the owner of the content and do not want us to publish your materials, please contact us by email – [email protected]. The content will be deleted within 24 hours.

Leave a Comment